This will add to EBITDA cost base. If NXL has been trying to generate short term EBITDA by under-employing, then then to fully invest back into their infrastructure they need to increase their employment base, this will reduce their EBITDA.
So whilst a positive for long term sustainability of the business model, it is a negative in the short term.
This will add to EBITDA cost base. If NXL has been trying to...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 595 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add NXL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$2.88 |
Change
0.020(0.70%) |
Mkt cap ! $931.7M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $2.84 | $2.94 | $2.84 | $833.6K | 287.6K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 11084 | $2.88 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $2.90 | 12882 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 21/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| NXL (ASX) Chart |