"Other methods for estimating pore pressure include. (I do not have hands on experience of these methods):"
Eaton method,
Ratio method,
Equivalent depth method,
Resistivity method with depth-dependent normal compaction trendline (NCT),
Sonic method with depth-dependent normal compaction trendline (NCT),
and the effective stress method."
I've worked with pretty much all of these methods (mainly in real time while drilling) over the years but whenever I was asked by the drillers to make recommendations based on what the models were telling me my advice was given with a careful explanation as to the limitations of the models. Many clients also used third party pore pressure "specialists" but I reckon less than a handful of those people actually understood the models they were running and the limitations of same....it was often a case of run the model and then adjust the results to fit what they thought they should be...dangerous stuff.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- IVZ
- Potential for Mukuyu-1's Results to be Above Market Expectations
Potential for Mukuyu-1's Results to be Above Market Expectations, page-251
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 39 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add IVZ (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
7.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $104.6M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
7.0¢ | 7.0¢ | 6.9¢ | $63.39K | 913.6K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 350000 | 6.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
7.0¢ | 164402 | 4 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 350000 | 0.069 |
5 | 244705 | 0.068 |
2 | 218700 | 0.067 |
2 | 44576 | 0.066 |
1 | 150000 | 0.065 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.070 | 164402 | 4 |
0.071 | 811144 | 9 |
0.072 | 1100138 | 10 |
0.073 | 1036012 | 6 |
0.074 | 1002617 | 6 |
Last trade - 15.05pm 11/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
IVZ (ASX) Chart |