"Other methods for estimating pore pressure include. (I do not have hands on experience of these methods):"
Eaton method,
Ratio method,
Equivalent depth method,
Resistivity method with depth-dependent normal compaction trendline (NCT),
Sonic method with depth-dependent normal compaction trendline (NCT),
and the effective stress method."
I've worked with pretty much all of these methods (mainly in real time while drilling) over the years but whenever I was asked by the drillers to make recommendations based on what the models were telling me my advice was given with a careful explanation as to the limitations of the models. Many clients also used third party pore pressure "specialists" but I reckon less than a handful of those people actually understood the models they were running and the limitations of same....it was often a case of run the model and then adjust the results to fit what they thought they should be...dangerous stuff.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Potential for Mukuyu-1's Results to be Above Market Expectations
"Other methods for estimating pore pressure include. (I do not...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 39 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add IVZ (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
8.1¢ |
Change
-0.007(7.95%) |
Mkt cap ! $116.6M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
8.7¢ | 8.7¢ | 7.8¢ | $550.8K | 6.685M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 6256 | 8.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
8.1¢ | 65918 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 126582 | 0.079 |
2 | 350000 | 0.076 |
7 | 757506 | 0.075 |
1 | 26000 | 0.073 |
3 | 365000 | 0.071 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.081 | 65918 | 1 |
0.082 | 100000 | 1 |
0.083 | 100000 | 1 |
0.084 | 39479 | 1 |
0.085 | 350000 | 2 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 05/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
IVZ (ASX) Chart |