NTU northern minerals limited

Potential Project Economics

  1. 3,237 Posts.
    In the current low rare earth price environment it does not appear to make any sense to build a hydromet plant.

    because by doing so we are duplicating a process which can already be preformed in China and in the process:-

    driving up our capex by $48.7M un-necessarily  and

    driving up our opex by $9.80 kg un-necessarily (the cost of reagents and consumables - used in the hydromet plant)

    eliminate the hydromet plant and it appears to me NTU then has a robustly viable mining operation producing and selling a concentrate

    ______________________________________________

    according to Jack Lifton and other reputable sources in relation to producing and selling a clean HREE concentrate
    into China there is a very small discount to the prices that can be obtained for individual separated HREEs

    http://investorintel.com/technology-metals-intel/a-mixed-con-is-a-mixed-blessing-in-rare-earths/

    ______________________________________________

    in a higher rare earth price environment it made good sense to progress with a hydromet plant - but not any more

    ROW end users want non-Chinese suppliers of HREE's but they don't want to pay a premium - instead they want non-Chinese suppliers of HREE at current Chinese prices - that's the reality

    The point is current rare earth prices are the reality, and we have to deal with them

    _______________________________________________
      
    Without the hydromet plant and the associated costs I believe NTU's numbers change dramatically:-

    This from the 1 May 2015 Investor Presentation:-
    Pre production capital costs estimates.JPG

    Now eliminate the Hyromet plant and the capex. reduces to $280.7M (USD$219M @ 0.78 cent exchange rate)

    Operating Costs.JPG
    Now eliminate the Hyromet plant and the operating costs reduce by $9.80 kg = $27.80 kg ($37.60 less $9.80)

    Now some assumptions on what NTU could generate in revenue per kg -  based on what Jack Lifton and other well informed sources have indicated lets say NTU can achieve 90% of the market price

    and you will recall that the metallurgy test work has revealed that recoveries are around 93%

    From the TMR website Browns Range current basket price is presently USD $55.61:-
    basket price.JPG
    http://www.techmetalsresearch.com/metrics-indices/tmr-advanced-rare-earth-projects-index/

    So USD $55.61 kg divided by 0.78 cent exchange rate = AUD $71.29 kg  X 93% recovery X 90% of full price = AUD$59.67 kg sale price

    AUD$59.67 kg less AUD$27.80 kg operating costs = AUD$31.87 kg net return

    3,200,000 kgs to be produced  X  $31.87 kg  =  AUD $101,984,000 in net operating revenue

    = less than a 3 year pay back

    _________________________________________

    The above are my "back of the envelope" calculations and assumptions, but it does appear to me that NTU is capable of generating more net revenue per KG from concentrate - than other rare earth producers will ever be able to achieve from selling a KG of separated REO.

    Best to all Northern Minerals shareholders and new investors
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)
Last
3.8¢
Change
0.000(0.00%)
Mkt cap ! $317.5M
Open High Low Value Volume
3.8¢ 4.0¢ 3.8¢ $145.7K 3.760M

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
20 2208539 3.8¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
3.9¢ 2705136 4
View Market Depth
Last trade - 16.10pm 19/09/2025 (20 minute delay) ?
NTU (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.