@immortalcombat ...It's not the fact of they could just attach a...

@immortalcombat ...It's not the fact of they could just attach a small drip feed. It brings up several points.

Firstly a hydroxyl radical generators are already available for sale, so there is nothing unique about another one on the market producing the same free radicals.
I wouldn't use a hydroxyl FRG in an occupied room either, because of chemical cascade chains that are started by the free radicals from different chemicals in (or could be in) indoor air. It's not just the residual ozone or hydroxyl radicals that are the problem, neither fully breaks down all chemicals quickly. The half life

Secondly if people have to attach something to have water flowing, it is no longer a simple plug in and turn on device. Also if just a container that owners would have to fill up, what happens when the container empties and the owner doesn't notice? Does it revert back to being an ozone generator, or does it turn itself off? Needing water becomes an inconvenience, so not a simple air purifier.

Thirdly, it's back to the inconsistencies in the company itself. On that diagram they clearly state ambient air produces Ozone, moist air produces Hydroxyl radicals, yet also not mentioning they could or would 'add water', or anything else.

I go by what the company states in ASX announcements as that is the information that counts, that directors are liable for. I've learnt over time to believe what company directors say or infer is a quick way to the poorhouse, if they are not prepared to put it in an official announcement. This applies to all companies!!