I agree with you about the PFS price used and the now...

I agree with you about the PFS price used and the now ‘potential’ upside to NPV of PFS...BUT it is clear Hazen has been engaged to Optimise the production process...what does this now mean for the costs listed in the PFS? What additional costs does this now add to the PFS cost structure and ultimately what does this do to the NPV of the PFS or future DFS?

What was done to the Eluate from the PP to produce the 99.97%?

How much additional cost does this add to a ton of Lithium?

How much additional time to produce product does this result in? What does this do to annual capacity of production based on current PFS and setup? Are capex costs now more?

Why is it taking so long to produce the first 5-6kg sample for Novonix given Hazen spent time initially optimising process? We are now a month past first small sample with no larger samples produced?

When is the company going to formally outline the process of DFS and associated costings and funding of said DFS?

There is a reason the share price didn’t move on samples and in fact retraced from 9c to 5c. Clear communication on all of the above and costings is what is needed along with solid support management for Steve to get this moving. discount the management comment all you like but this is important..like it or not.

Tin foil hat time, I’m a believer their is a bigger plan here with the partnerships with Hazen and Novonix but in order to get their we need to put solid support around the shareprice and that comes from answering the above questions and setting out the plan for the company..CLEARLY...Otherwise the first offer of takeover will be approved minimising returns for holders.

I look forward to attending this weeks AGM and asking the above along with a few other difficult questions of Steve. The way he answers should be very telling.