KAPOIf I understand your comment correctly you are saying:1. MHM...

  1. 1,091 Posts.
    KAPO

    If I understand your comment correctly you are saying:

    1. MHM creates a new Silica Mining Company

    2. A totally separate company, lets say Wacker Chemie AG as an example, then develops the Smelter by themselves.

    3. The new MHM Silica Co does however get a free carried stake (say 5%) in the smelter. Atkin to receiving a 5% share of profits.

    4. The Silica Mining Company obviously then has a guaranteed customer, the Smelter owned 95% by Wacker Chemie AG and 5% by themselves.

    That certainly would be another way of doing things. It would be interesting to see what the financial implications of this would be as the Silica Mining Co would be taking on more risk in this instance.
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)
Last
52.0¢
Change
0.010(1.96%)
Mkt cap ! $274.2M
Open High Low Value Volume
52.5¢ 52.5¢ 51.0¢ $54.37K 104.4K

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
4 131749 51.0¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
53.0¢ 210000 3
View Market Depth
Last trade - 16.11pm 14/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ?
VYS (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.