"Analysts had already conducted independent polls long before the US elections, they knew the odds were in favour of Trump. When Harris stepped up to the table, it was a given as most yanks know that it would be hard to get a coloured female across the line in the States".
Absolutely. Analysts have a vested interest in an accurate result. Media or partisan conducted polls target a demographic aimed at producing a result that suits the election dynamic at the time. Any sort of negative poll for Harris will have scuttled the strategy of 'remaining positive and riding the wave'. An overly positive poll for Trump would have affected voter turnout, due to complacency in the anti Harris swinging voter.
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)