Charlie, ignored? Definitely not!!
Get manically excited about it, claiming it is another huge asset, shouts of eureka, WM is a genius etc. ..... definitely not!!
It requires a lot of work to be proved up. Check out BDG, HEG, CRS, CTO ...
But it is shallow, which will help to make it quick and cheap to prove up, and to mine.
Process, whatever it is has been intersected at two angles. Hole 240 is vertical, so we have a vertical depth of 1m or less, and we have a 30deg from the horizontal intersection of the same length, at the same spot, from the east. It could be a plate on a dip from west to east, it could be a long vein, it could be a lens.
Sure, it could be the big one. But atm it looks horribly like a welcome diversion from things like EIS, ML, finance, bulk tests, production schedules etc. etc.
pre open news coming, page-67
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 15 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)