Hey Stupid Bloke,It is a certainty that the GOG, when they sent...

Hey Stupid Bloke,
It is a certainty that the GOG, when they sent the communication to explain the rejection of the 2919 EIA, told GGG a number of things that they will feel require some significant additional work that the GOG thinks is undone, and some additional work that they feel needs to be redone.
I have no idea what they might see as work that is undone. But given what is being said in the Greenland press, the GOG seems to be unhappy with the GGG Sampling Program, and also unhappy with the GGG tailings dam and their Tailings Handling System and Facility.
First the Sampling. GGG chose to take all the samples for this program from a 1970s abandoned tailing dump, not from the underground Kvanefjeld Ore as would be the norm. The samples taken from the dump have been criticized as being totally washed out over the 40 years they have been in the tailings dump, exposed to the weather. It is argued that they are not at all representative of the Kvanefjeld Ore, and that the whole program must be completely redone, as the work done on tailings dam Ore bears no relation to the real Kvanefeld Ore and all work done from it is useless and must be totally redone. If they must redo it all that is a minimum 1 year project. If you have to also redo all the Tailings Dam and Handling Systems, that also will take significant time and money.

It is important to mention that the GOG is not being unreasonable to GGG. The standards that they demand are on par with that which are required in most all of the developed world. The problem in Kvanefjeld is that GGG specified their consultants do work that was not up to these well known standards. They seem to have been looking to cut corners and like the EIA's, the work is failing to be accepted, instead the GOG is forcing GGG to redo it all to standards.

Ciao