NRO,You say "GGG's performance has been brilliant". What in the...

NRO,
You say "GGG's performance has been brilliant". What in the world is your definition of "Brilliant ?

First, Did the company not know about the Uranium in Kvanefjeld when they made the 34 communications to the ASX telling them when the EIA would be submitted and done. Was that Brilliant?

Was their failure to meet every goal they set in these communications over 10 years brilliant?

Was the companies excessive spending (269,000,000 spent and 204,000,000 given away to the directors and their friends and promotors) brilliant, especially when they were not able to get even the first step accomplished in the ML process after all the money and 12 years spent?

Was the fund raising necessary to feed the spending and money it gave away that caused dilution of the shares to rise 1200% brilliant?

Was the company's managing the share price in its fall from $2.00 (when the company was saying shares were going to $10) to .10 cents over the past 10 years brilliant? that's a 92.6 % fall in the share price, again brilliant?

So NRO, are these things the brilliance you speak of?
I don't see these actions as you seem to, I see these facts of the results of current management to be failures. I would challenge you to find another company in the world who, faced with these sorts of failures for results hasn't fired and changed the management who were responsible for the failures.

At this point, with the above failures, changing the management would be the only brilliant thing we shareholders can do.

Ciao