Not quite right.
When the shorter sells, ownership goes directly to buyer, who then gets dividends and new issues etc.
Meanwhile the shorter has a contract with the lender which usually says the shorter has to pay the lender any dividends, etc.
There is another issue also - the lender retains the option on how to vote at AGMs, but I don't understand how that can be done unless the shorter has not yet sold his shares. Does anybody know?
Not quite right.When the shorter sells, ownership goes directly...
Add PLS (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$4.16 |
Change
0.055(1.34%) |
Mkt cap ! $12.46B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $4.13 | $4.17 | $4.11 | $29.96M | 7.230M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 74 | 142828 | $4.15 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $4.16 | 400090 | 65 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 14.10pm 20/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
$4.16 |
Change
0.055 ( 1.42 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| $4.14 | $4.17 | $4.12 | 2411880 | ||
| Last updated 14.28pm 20/05/2024 ? | |||||
| PLS (ASX) Chart |