Assuming the approach adopted for FAS's SP is 1/7 of GWR then...

Assuming the approach adopted for FAS's SP is 1/7 of GWR then WHY does GWR's SP not reflect this.
A table for review
FAS GWR

0.329 2.300* FAS's True Value ( Based in GWR SP
0.330 2.310 04/01/2008)
0.331 2.320
0.333 2.330
0.334 2.340
0.336 2.350
0.337 2.360
0.339 2.370
0.340 2.380
0.341 2.390
0.343 2.400
0.344 2.410
0.346 2.420
0.347 2.430
0.349 2.440
0.350 2.450
0.351 2.460
0.353 2.470
0.354 2.480
0.356 2.490
0.357 2.500
0.359 2.510
0.360 2.520
0.361 2.530
0.363 2.540
0.364 2.550
0.366 2.560
0.367 2.570
0.369 2.580
0.370 2.590* GWR Value (Based on FAS's SP 04/01/2008)

Assuming one feeds off the other, then IMO the only conclusion I can assume is that the entity with the proven asset being GWR should be sitting at $2.59 or has its share priced been CAPPED. Wally can you please explain if my assumption is valid. To all one can you see why this merger issue is so confusing to the average laymen investor. The company that has the resource is worthless according to WALLY, yet the company with no proven assets other than Classic Projects is worth more. Man my financial advisor must have got things around the wrong way eh INCO.
DYOR but I am totally confused.