Some of you guys are living on another planet. It's one thing to...

Some of you guys are living on another planet. It's one thing to hope for new data at a conference, but another to expect it and get all pissy when it doesn't eventuate. If you've been around a while, you know that when it comes to these conferences that some of the popular posters pump hard that they are expecting and even certain of new results and expect it to be the big one. Every single conference. The majority of them though it doesn't happen. And that's not reflection on their posts, generally speaking there is plenty of useful information in their content if you can read through them, but when it comes to this sort of thing it's all opinions. The need is to look at what the company has said.

• New data will be presented at major medical conferences. Do not expect this to be every conference, that's ridiculous
• Each patient is scanned at 42 days. A scan is not results. A scan is a photo in a patient file for the attending doctor. Results, aka a data cut, is the acquisition, analysis and conclusions of all of the data points of every patient.
• Data cuts are costly and time consuming, and the company has said they won't be doing it frequently. Just because we want to see it, doesn't mean it's time. Look at how long the first cut took.
• AACR was never an oral presentation. The only oral scheduled atm is the cholangiocarcinoma conference.
• Compare the speed of any other trial and result releases with Imugene's, and you will likely be happier with what we get. Despite the feeling of watching paint dry, we are moving fast.

By all means live in hope, but to live in expectation sets oneself up for disappointment and only feeds the all the negative Muppets ammunition to drag the content down with them.