The injunction would have been in the Netherlands where the holding company was listed, to delay completion until the Senegal upstream asset valuation was no longer in dispute. Interestingly FAR did not notify COP that they had any disagreement with asset valuation or method. They wanted the terms and conditions of the share sale of the holding company.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Pressure back on WPL
The injunction would have been in the Netherlands where the...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 69 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add FAR (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
51.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $47.12M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 92577 | 50.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
51.0¢ | 101000 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 92577 | 0.505 |
1 | 62764 | 0.500 |
4 | 210449 | 0.495 |
1 | 99999 | 0.490 |
2 | 104597 | 0.485 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.510 | 101000 | 2 |
0.515 | 3300 | 1 |
0.520 | 421965 | 4 |
0.525 | 100000 | 1 |
0.530 | 20000 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.16pm 02/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
FAR (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable