For those who are trumpeting soil samples this and soil samples...

For those who are trumpeting soil samples this and soil samples that . Probably best if they did a bit of wider research in terms of the Geology prerequisites and anomalies with regards to LCT and other trace mineralizations FIRST.

Like for instance those surrounding the World's largest Lithium and Tantalum mine in Greenbushes who' own original ' arsenic ' predominant Laterite covered spodumene showings are predominantly highlighted by the categories of 65 ppm Laterite followed by 200 ppm by some and a probably equal amount to the 200 pmm of 400 ppm.

So even Galan who's tenements were approximately 15 klm's to the South and LPI's which is less of a distance to the North had initial soil's up ' UP TO ' but NOT all of 215 ppm , but which didn't produce anything of any significance in terms of spodumene from their clear pegmatite ' outcropping ' in their FIRST round of drilling.

So nothing can be assured from even rock chips much less soils until the ' Mapped ' pegmatites are actually drilled. And in Greenbushes case , they didn't even know they had spodumene until they drilled below the thick layer of ' Laterites ' which had the high lithium marker arsenic which at least indicated they were on the right track with the likelihood and probability high of Lithium Spodumene concentration below surface.

And in ODE's case , the amount of soils actually ' Returned ' to establish the category of OVER 100 ppm as against MI6's which shows 110 to 230 ppm only 3 - 5 kilometres away , is but a fraction of the actual total soils samples taken and waiting analysis.

So I wouldn't be too fussed right now based on what actually has gone to the Labs , and what has come back ......., which is not much......