Still getting fooled by the “arbitrarily scale the y-axes to make it look like there’s no correlation” trick? Mate, I’m embarrassed for you.
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/es...rut4gl/mean:12/from:1960/scale:100/offset:335
Not only that, but the whole argument of this guy is really silly. CO2 measurements made indoors, in labs with no forced air circulation, unknown numbers of people and combustion sources, versus measurements taken in very carefully managed outdoor conditions... I know which one I’d choose. I mean, simply breathing within a couple of feet of a measurement would spike the result by a couple dozen PPM... a group of people in a closed room can quickly send it up by hundreds.
