I'm not sure which part of the L-Max process has been patented. Perhaps all of it?
So from a patent perspective does the below count as 'prior art', potentially impacting the validity of the L-Max patent? It's an atmospheric sulphuric acid leach to liberate Li from mica successfully trialled prior to 1993.
I know nothing about patents or patent law and am genuinely interested in responses that could shed light on this issue.
I'm not sure which part of the L-Max process has been patented....
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add EMH (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
15.5¢ |
Change
0.015(10.7%) |
Mkt cap ! $32.15M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 15.5¢ | 15.8¢ | 15.5¢ | $3.748K | 24.17K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | 76555 | 14.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0¢ | 33724 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 14.43pm 11/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| EMH (ASX) Chart |