Prof. Dedi Meiri, Prof. Dudi Meire one and the same, page-8

Well ... it's all speculation until you know the facts.

Even then, some posters appear very keen on turning facts back towards speculation.

So ... until any new facts are put forward ... we do know;
1. That the management services agreement will continue to be paid to a related party.
2. That two related entities (AGMPL and Volcan) owe money to CGB shareholders.
3. That in excess of $1,000,000 has been paid to a research project in a foreign jurisdiction.

I could go on about the bauxite dream as well but ... there seems little point.

Frankly, my personal observation is this, 'I am reasonably certain I know who is getting paid and I can surmise who is not!'

And I still cannot figure out how the interests of CGB shareholders is served by the loaning of money that is interest free and unsecured, to AGMPL and Volcan?

More worryingly, why haven't those debts, that have been accrued by these related parties, not yet been repaid to shareholders?

"Research initiatives" - pfft!

Perhaps, they could / should turn their minds to some basic 'debt collection initiatives'?

I also recall also some piffling yap about "dividends" some months ago? How would posters classify that - fact or speculation?