I own PXUPA from much higher levels - probably $50++
I have read this thread but that is all I have read so excuse this dumb question or just please let me know if somewhere in the many posts that have been before this one I can find the explanation.
If indeed PXUPA holders can block capital raising and company is desperate to raise capital, then the answer seems simple: PXUPA holders get $100 worth of shares in PPX and the PPX holders take the "haircut". Unlike GNS/GNSPA, there is no maximum ratio so why should Management introduce one?
The reason people invested in PXUPA rather than PPX was to have the priority (of quasi debt) over equity.
I am obviously missing something.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- profit discussion
I own PXUPA from much higher levels - probably $50++I have read...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SRS (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
1CG
ONE CLICK GROUP LIMITED
Mark Waller, MD
Mark Waller
MD
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online