"all the examples that you throw up are all tangible items.if...

"all the examples that you throw up are all tangible items.

if you haven't realise yet, you cant physically touch shares."

In a nutshell you're saying it's ok to sell shares that you do not own because they're not tangible. Using your own reasoning then it's ok if someone sells your identity because after all your identity is NOT tangible. How would feel about that?

In a nutshell I am saying it's unethical to sell things you do not own, whether they are tangible or not.

Your argument is based on tangible vs intangible. My argument is based on ownership vs non-ownership.

"... they are just a value that moves up and down depending on the mood of the market determined by people in it. " This is YOUR view of shares. My view of shares is part ownership of a company.

"...if you don't like that truth, then you probably should be participating in it." huh??