this is a genuine question and not meant as an insult to any group of people or individual.
when you think of Evolution, survival of the fittest, think about the first thing you would evolve out, to help the species pro-create.
and after say 40 000 years of human evolution, what is the first thing that would have fallen by the wayside because it does nothing to help the species pro-create.
the first thing that comes to mind for me is Homosexuality.
Think about it, there has always been homosexuals and there always will, but if we were evolving, why keep a trait that does nothing to help you evolve.
I'm not being Homophobic, just stating an obvious point,
isn't homosexuality proof that man was created and not evolved?
- Forums
- Philosophy & Religion
- proof of creation
proof of creation
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 172 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)