Your thesis depends heavily on homosexuality being the result of a gene inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion.
I don't know about required prevalence of a recessive "gay gene" to explain the numbers of people reporting they are homosexual but I highly doubt if there are solid enough evidences to support even a recessive gene theory.
Given that the gene theory is in my opinion not correct, your example doesn't really benefit from using homosexuality as a "proof".
I think all it shows at best is that homosexuality is probably a chosen ir adopted behaviour rather than something intrinsic to the organism.
- Forums
- Philosophy & Religion
- proof of creation
proof of creation, page-2
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 53 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
RAC
RACE ONCOLOGY LTD
Dr Pete Smith, Executive Chairman
Dr Pete Smith
Executive Chairman
SPONSORED BY The Market Online