Your thesis depends heavily on homosexuality being the result of a gene inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion.
I don't know about required prevalence of a recessive "gay gene" to explain the numbers of people reporting they are homosexual but I highly doubt if there are solid enough evidences to support even a recessive gene theory.
Given that the gene theory is in my opinion not correct, your example doesn't really benefit from using homosexuality as a "proof".
I think all it shows at best is that homosexuality is probably a chosen ir adopted behaviour rather than something intrinsic to the organism.
- Forums
- Philosophy & Religion
- proof of creation
proof of creation, page-2
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 53 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
NUZ
NEURIZON THERAPEUTICS LIMITED
Dr Michael Thurn, CEO & MD
Dr Michael Thurn
CEO & MD
SPONSORED BY The Market Online