You were suggesting that homosexuality is proof of creation.
Your premise was that homosexuality would extinguish since it is not procreative. Ie. a homosexual individual would not or would be unable tend to pass on their genes.
Evolution is about modification in the genome that are passed on to subsequent generations.
So you are saying homosexuality should not be prevalent if evolution were true.
What I said was your premise at best merely shows that homosexuality is not genetic.
That it is a behavioural rather than a gene related phenomenon.
- Forums
- Philosophy & Religion
- proof of creation
You were suggesting that homosexuality is proof of creation....
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
HAR
HARANGA RESOURCES LIMITED.
Peter Batten, MD
Peter Batten
MD
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online