Sid The first two comments are devoid of science. FACT. Are you are BOT. Seems like a bot commenting back so quickly.
The last comment you make appears to reference science.
You have been presented with irrefutable facts on temperature data verse gravitational data for the location of Darwin. The gravitational data is averaged simply on latitude with no CORE density changes factored into gravitationsal changes that actually occur's daily.
I would not mind betting if we were able to access gravitational changes daily at a given location then the correlation between temperature and gravity would jump from 99.3% to 99.8% PLUS
Shit. the fact that we have a NEAR perfect correlation and YOU end up DENYING maths. What type of people are we dealing with here?
