That first paragraph is completely wrong, Scott and you know it.
Drinkers? smokers? high meat eaters immunocompromised? Don't you have a background in health? You should know better than to tell lies. This sort of rubbish might be ferreted out in a RC.
With respect to covid-19, the term 'immunocompromised' referred to those with:
Active treatment for solid tumor and hematologic malignancies
receiving treatment for solid organ transplant.
severe combined immunodeficiency, DiGeorge syndrome, Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome
Advanced or untreated HIV infection
those receiving cancer chemotherapeutic agents classified as severely immunosuppressive and the like.
That's from the CDC, not ScottDC.
Most Australians? There's a huge difference between being immunocompromised and engaging in activities or pursuits that may reduce your immune system down from 100%. You're talking as though one bloke has a glass of red with dinner and he's at significantly heightened risk of getting covid and ending up on a ventilator.
This sort of rubbish is exactly the sort of stuff that has eroded trust in our institutions......sensationalising and exagerrating facts around covid.
Don't embellish into the realm of lies just to bolster your argument Scott. You've done that before, many times. Let your argument stand on its own two feet, and let it teeter or not.
A Royal Commission with broad terms of refernce would never, ever be allowed to see the light of day, Scott. Too many lies were told to the Australian public to have it aired.....in public.
