EPC 1045. BWN buy it for $2.7m, spend a couple of million on it and then Minnelex value it at $1.09m (100%) despite valuing it at $5.1m in the 2008 IER using the Prospectivity Enhancement Multiplier approach?
Please explain how the $ per sub-block method should take precedence over the PEM method.
Also please explain why you would use such a low PEM as per your previous post where you stated 1.25 would be appropriate. In the 2008 IER a PEM of 3.0 was used for EPC 1045. All other EPCs had PEMs of 2.5 or 3 with the exception of Tarong and Cape River which had 1.5 (whereas I would have used 1.0).
I look forward to your response.
EPC 1045. BWN buy it for $2.7m, spend a couple of million on it...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 12 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BWN (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
68.5¢ |
Change
0.025(3.79%) |
Mkt cap ! $188.5M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 67.0¢ | 68.5¢ | 66.0¢ | $27.50K | 40.92K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2500 | 66.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 69.0¢ | 19683 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.00pm 21/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BWN (ASX) Chart |