psychological or supernatural?, page-27

First of all, u should define the frames of reference.
1. What is your definition of God. After this is the most conflicting and controversial subject, in the history of humanity which has caused many deaths distress as well as benefits, to humanity. Why u ask such a subjective question, that like religion, which is what the question is all about and try to call it psychology or supernatural, is simply changing the frames of meaning reference for rhetorical freedom on your part. The question is to others, when u have no defined system, seems to mean u are looking for the usual millions of different ideas that have been rehased in different words, that are simply a waste of everbodies time, as there will be no result that will benefit anyone, excpet he usual tolerance of millions of others points of view.

2. What is your reference for this definition.
3. Is it external or internal frame of reference. If it is inciting a following of external, then it it powerless, compared to following one's own internal inner creator, that is in harmony with the external creator and the composite external/internal creator, energy field of the space.
4. What is your percentage of tolerance to your definitions.
5. Why do u ask these questions on the Religion and philosophy thread.