buckmoister? I don't even want to go there, not a pretty word picture. Xtsharest, by the use of the term transferred I suspect robhaywood means to pass from one entity to another that are closely connected. He's right in a way, it was however a sale and as such, one entity passed ownership of the shares to another (close) entity for the consideration of 1.2 cents. I take the point that deansy was making re tax planning and also that the Forrest Capital boys via their initial investments years ago (JK Nominees etc) & more recently as underwriter & placement recipient have significantly lowered their cost base to around 1.2, Jones having bought significantly over the past 3 > 4 years has a cost base around 1.2. Interesting if you believe in coincidence, unfortunately I don't. What was that old law of physics, every action as an equal & opposite reaction? Funny how tha vast majority of shares on issue now owe their owners approx 1.2 cents.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- pump and dump
buckmoister? I don't even want to go there, not a pretty word...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 38 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add RMG (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
FHE
FRONTIER ENERGY LIMITED
Adam Kiley, CEO
Adam Kiley
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online