"The top tank can cover a wider area with less depth which would...

  1. 80,443 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 75

    "The top tank can cover a wider area with less depth which would provide even more head pressure. Make the top tank 100m deep"

    so - you are going to build a wide tank 100 METRES deep ----- on top

    then - you are going to let it fall when it's full - to a generator that is at the apx. 300 metre deep mark in your pit (a head of 400 m ) - then pump water back up from the 300 metre deep mark -- to your top tank - against a head of 400 metres

    now - your head pressure is

    400 m when your depth in hole is 300 m

    300 m when your depth in hole is 200 m

    200 m when your depth in hole is 100 m

    100 m when your depth in hole is surface

    now

    "If you matched the 'little' bit of volume in the first 300m at the bottom of the pit with a similar volume holding tank at surface level you would have a massive volume containing the latent energy store."

    are you meaning that your hole only ever holds 300 metres of water - or do you mean that your hole working depths vary between surface and 300 m

    I got a bit confused there???

    if you meant you were only using the bottom 300 - then, the calculations would be different of course - just as problematic though.


    And, even if one could make this system work -- I have no doubt one could use it to generate power - recharging it could be a hell of a problem though - but, lets get over that - even if one could get it to work -

    who exactly is going to pay for it???????????
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.