while we wait, can I raise a question? and this has to do with our AEM survey. In a Feb ann presenting our AEM conductors in Cal East the company writes:
"The Warrior project airborne EM survey
has been designed to locate conductors related to massive sulphide PGE-Ni-Cu mineralisation associated with mafic and ultramafic intrusions."
I wonder what "has been designed" means. What I realized is that the company reports
channel Z 45 results - "late time" which obviously stands for strong conductors and we know that PGE etc. is particularly likely in such strong conductors. When I check other companies in the regions, their AEMs typically report results for lower channels (e.g., DEV at Sovereign: channel 16-22). In fact, I haven't found one company in the region that report such a late channel like in our ann. It seems 45 is very, very late-time, if you want.
I know you cannot simply compare such results and there are different types of channels. But could one say that a conductor identified with channel 45 is more promising (particularly re: PGE etc. in this prospective region) than conductors visible in channel 22? So are we "super late-time" whereas others in the region report "late-time" conductors? Do we have the strongest conductors among the recent AEMs in the region?
sorry if this question is stupid! It is just something that I noticed - the very different channels reported in the AEM results in this region, and that we stand out with our channel 45.
