Push for nuclear energy ignores glaring problem
Australia also has oodles of uranium so SMRs could help make us more energy-independent. In particular, it would help reduce our foreign oil dependency which renders the nation a sitting duck in case of any naval blockade.
However, in practice, there are some very big problems with SMRs.
The most pressing is that they do not currently exist. There are only two working prototypes worldwide. They might exist in the future in economic form if many of them are manufactured. But, for now, only China and Russia are operating them, and they were very expensive to build.
Peter Dutton’s $1.5tr of new network cost is a preposterous figure that could string a gold-plated cable around Australia several times.The below chart from the CSIRO projects a halving of SMR costs by 2030, and they are still the most expensive power available:
https://www.news.com.au/finance/economy/australian-economy/push-for-nuclear-energy-ignores-glaring-problem/news-story/a1a6fdcabab448ce60642adcfcd9318a
Raider
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Push for nuclear energy ignores glaring problem
Push for nuclear energy ignores glaring problem
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 58 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Iggy Tan, Executive Chairman
Iggy Tan
Executive Chairman
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online