Push for nuclear energy ignores glaring problem, page-2

  1. 35,331 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 4
    Exactly.

    " It is a tall story told by industry interests and captured pollies to slow the end of fossil fuels. "

    And this is the problem with Dutton and his RWNJ mates. They are deliberately trying to mislead the public to create a bit of distraction.

    He has nothing of substance to offer so he is just going down the shock jock route.

    The facts are:

    Off the shelf proven commercial grid SMR's do not exist and are a decade away at best. Given the rate of renewable/firming/evs uptake in Australia, they have no hope of competing with much cheaper renewables. They are nothing more than non existent white elephants.

    Dutton claimed the nuclear supplies 60% of Canada's power. He is lying.

    From the World Nuclear Association :
    " About 15% of Canada's electricity comes from nuclear power, with 19 reactors mostly in Ontario providing 13.6 GWe of power capacity. "
    Dutton proposes placing multiple SMRs at existing coal baseload sites. Apart from community rejection , many multiple SMRs instead of couple of large reactors is the least effficient use of the technology.
    The COAL-lition is dead. The best they can do is lie to the public in a sad pathetic attempt to remain relevant.
    lt is time to flush the COAL-lition dunny and get rid of the turds.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.