Exactly.
" It is a tall story told by industry interests and captured pollies to slow the end of fossil fuels. "
And this is the problem with Dutton and his RWNJ mates. They are deliberately trying to mislead the public to create a bit of distraction.
He has nothing of substance to offer so he is just going down the shock jock route.
The facts are:
Off the shelf proven commercial grid SMR's do not exist and are a decade away at best. Given the rate of renewable/firming/evs uptake in Australia, they have no hope of competing with much cheaper renewables. They are nothing more than non existent white elephants.
Dutton claimed the nuclear supplies 60% of Canada's power. He is lying.
From the World Nuclear Association :
" About 15% of Canada's electricity comes from nuclear power, with 19 reactors mostly in Ontario providing 13.6 GWe of power capacity. "
Dutton proposes placing multiple SMRs at existing coal baseload sites. Apart from community rejection , many multiple SMRs instead of couple of large reactors is the least effficient use of the technology.
The COAL-lition is dead. The best they can do is lie to the public in a sad pathetic attempt to remain relevant.
lt is time to flush the COAL-lition dunny and get rid of the turds.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Push for nuclear energy ignores glaring problem
Push for nuclear energy ignores glaring problem, page-2
- There are more pages in this discussion • 116 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
ACW
ACTINOGEN MEDICAL LIMITED
Steven Gourlay, CEO
Steven Gourlay
CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online