Langers seriously, even the Russians have agreed it was a buk...

First 18 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Red rooster01

234 Posts.

29/09/16

15:45

Post #: 19513274
Share

Originally posted by Langers ↑

Still waiting on the control tower recording and black box to be released for transparency should such a serious claim be made that Putin did it. (Gee what happened to the non-Ukrainian ground controller who was directing the flight where is he, maybe he had an accident).

Allowing Malaysia and Russia unfettered access to all evidence for such a serious accusation, like the back box and control tower tapes instead of the closed investigation done by the US, Dutch and Ukrainian regime that has the most to blame in accusing Russia.

Evidence of a Buk missile trail which would have been noticed at least 20km away from the place of impact (There is evidence of fighters in the area at the time).

A explanation as why some of the holes in the cockpit don't resemble missile fragments but very high caliber projectiles fired from a warplane.

The use of the radar information Russia disclosed at the very start to investigators.

A serious explanation why the flight was deviated by the Ukrainian authorities over a war zone when other western nations like the US clearly saw it unfit to be near the area entirely.

Why the the need to rehash the loss of the Malaysian flight over Ukraine now? Is it because:
1. America need to continue the theme of Russia is bad and uncooperative like in Syria to impose further penalties/sanctions and a Syrian no-fly zone.
2. Arm their Al-nusera and ISIS proxies via distribution through the "moderate" Free Syrian Army (i.e. manpads) that are having the stuffing kicked out of it by the Russian air force, particularly in Aleppo.
3. Deflect the continued fallout from America supporting ISIS in Syria when they deliberately targeted Syrian Government positions.
4. Deflect further fallout if Russia releases the full terms agreed by America in the last ceasefire but was reneged in Syria to would embarrass the US (just like their fake claims that Russia bombed an Aid convoy)
5. To justify further atrocities that are about to be committed by the Ukrainian regime and its Nazis/right sector forces over the Donbass people.
6. To justify further direct intervention of US forces in Syria or Ukraine to combat Russian "aggression".
7. all the above plus more

Expand

Langers seriously, even the Russians have agreed it was a buk missile that bought it down. The only question is who fired it. That would most likely be the Russian backed rebels. The old fighter jet nonsense got lampooned eons ago.
Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

FEG

China's Xingye snags 19.99% stake in Far East Gold, eyeing latter's Indonesian gold play

ADH

Adairs MD and CEO steps down after 17 years in company management

SRN

Copper and zinc zone prove exciting news for Surefire close to WA's Yidby

DEL

Delorean unlocks $30M through Tanarra finance facility for bioenergy projects

Is the ASX getting its groove back? Here's 5 IPOs in September to watch