Hi Nathan
If I am understanding your points correctly, it would appear that if the RE knocks back the Section 252B application due to Clause 23 that you rightfully point out, then the Unitholders' other option would be to replace the RE and appoint another RE that is more aligned to the Unitholders' and for that new RE to make the changes to the Constitution that are currently being requested by Special Resolution.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?