Nathan
Correct, but consider the possibilities:
(1) If the request was technically flawed then surely the RE would have advised of this immediately; or does it choose to play games.
(2) If it was technically correct, then the RE would be pressured by PPX to stall while PPX find a legal loophole.
(3) What if the RE and PPX hold strong conflicting views? This then gets interesting.
More on this topic at Fiduciary Duty versus Funded Duty? at you know where.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- pxupas have a problem which is solveable
NathanCorrect, but consider the possibilities:(1) If the request...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SRS (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online