Thx for the thoughts. There are some DCF factors in there, which are fine, but the rest of the things you mention are "risks", i.e .chances of success....which is what I thought 'risks' meant, so get rid of those and come back to DCF and plug in numbers, then even if 1 of 4 is successful you get a DCF above $1.20.....so, what does their version of unrisked mean? In this context it almost certainly has to factor in risk around COS, meaning in reality it most likely is still a "risked" valuation. Perhaps they're just being conservative on the upside valuations because printing anything else could look 'silly'..!?
Thx for the thoughts. There are some DCF factors in there, which...
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.15 |
Change
-0.050(4.17%) |
Mkt cap ! $670.7M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.18 | $1.20 | $1.15 | $146.7K | 125.4K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 71742 | $1.15 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.20 | 11949 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 18/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PYC (ASX) Chart |