Even if an EGM doesn't eventuate, what's the harm in shareholders being a little more organised for the AGM.
Do you think that it's democratic for shareholders to only have resolutions to vote on created by a mother and son executive team?
Do you think this company would be better served long term by independant representation on the board?
Do you think independent representation will be offered by those currently in charge? Even if they did, how does that then make it independent?
While everyone is focused on the $80m mcap company, I am focused on what the $500m mcap company will look like.
Do you want control of your $500m company in the hands of just two family members?
Even if an EGM doesn't eventuate, what's the harm in...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 172 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)