Perhaps finding an additional executive that can keep the existing ones grounded is what is best for everyone. When they propose a personal load of shareholders money, the other directors could perhaps reign them in. When they engage related entity services, perhaps the other directors could advise against it.
Just as an example, I couldn't hold down two jobs and claim to be at both at the same time. Taking two wages for the same hours. Some workers moonlight on the side, but rarely during their primary employers time.
It just feels to me that there is duplication in the costs we are incurring if we are paying the same people as directors and through a related entity for effectively the same work. Am I understanding the relationship and role of AGMPL correctly? I'm happy to be corrected on this.
QBL Price at posting:
3.7¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
