”there is a difference between being aware of real data and focusing on spurious data from dubious media sites.
when ppl decide their former position is in error, as I've needed to do many times, and reliable data provides evidence of this, its sensible to accept ones error. its also safer.”
Would you care to explain what that all means?
It’s nothing more than your opinion, but what about is anyone’s guess.
You give zero backup to your claims.
The sum total of that post is Zero.
It amounts to waffle about SFA.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- qualifications of anti vaxxers on HC
”there is a difference between being aware of real data and...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 45 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)