qualifications of anti vaxxers on HC

Originally posted by Marketinfo: ↑

174 Posts.
10

Johnny-come-lately...................... get with the programme and do some homework.

The info is on the Science and Medicine Forum if you wish to read and view it.

Immunologist papers and video interviews = plenty

Epidemiologist papers and video interviews = plenty

Vaccinologist papers and video interviews = plenty

Conspiracy Theorists = the Government has the Franchise for that ....... it's called Government Legislation.

Lawyers and Politicians are so into Conspiracy Theories that they have created Laws Governing it.

If the Public have a theory that a Criminal act is being perpetrated, they are just following the Government's view on the matter.

Conspiracy – Commonwealth Criminal Code s 11.5
The Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) Ch 2 codifies the general principles of criminal responsibility
with respect to the offences against the laws of the Commonwealth. It applies to all
Commonwealth offences since 15 December 2001: s 2.2.
In general terms, a person who conspires with another person to commit a
[Commonwealth] offence is guilty of the offence of conspiracy to commit that
offence.
It is an offence under Australian law for a person to [specify the offence the subject
of the conspiracy eg import narcotic goods into Australia]. For a defendant to be
guilty of conspiracy to commit [specify the offence], the prosecution must prove
beyond reasonable doubt that:
1. the defendant entered into an agreement with one or more other persons;
and
2. the defendant and at least one other party to the agreement must have
intended that an offence would be committed pursuant to the agreement; and
3. the defendant or at least one party to the agreement must have committed
an overt act pursuant to the agreement.1
The prosecution must prove each of these matters beyond reasonable doubt.
They are cumulative requirements for the offence of conspiracy.
It is not an element of the offence of conspiracy that the offence intended to be
committed is in fact committed.2 And it is irrelevant that performance of the
offence the subject of the conspiracy is impossible.3
The offence of conspiracy is more than just the agreement to commit the offence
with the requisite intention of the parties. The offence of conspiracy is incomplete
unless either the defendant or one other party to the agreement has committed an
overt act pursuant to the agreement. An overt act is simply an act done pursuant
1 Section 11.5(2) Criminal Code.
2 Section 11.5(3)(d) Criminal Code provides that a person may be found guilty of conspiracy to commit an
offence even if “all other parties to the agreement have been acquitted of the conspiracy”. However, that
provision is subject to s 11.5(4)(a) Criminal Code which provides, “A person cannot be found guilty of
conspiracy to commit an offence if all other parties to the agreement have been acquitted of the conspiracy and
a finding of guilty would be inconsistent with their acquittal".
3 Section 11.5(3)(a) Criminal Code.
Benchbook – Conspiracy – Commonwealth Criminal Code s 11.5 No 198.1
March 2017 Amendments

Expand

ouch!!!!!!

you must have spent a lot of time compiling that load of cobblers

again you are not qualified in any of the fields posted

posting or reading said qualified information does not make you qualified

you should know better being the supposed experienced poster

geez - couldn't even get my name right - for a start, it's not hyphenated