quasar v ags, page-2

I am very conscious that I take an optimistic view of all this and post accordingly. But that does not mean that we optimists cant see the risks. I do think that AGS should be much more open with what goes on behind the scenes. There are far too many questions posed on this thread where the answer should be public knowledge eg (1)What do the directors consider a fair price and have they had any overtures (2)Can AGS sell to a third party (3) Is there a protection for AGS in the original agreement against Quasar intimidation - can they take the resource back. I don't think AGS gains by playing it all close to the chest and if all info is out there in regular updates the market is fully informed and Heathgate are forced to engage in the open forum