Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

And it still would have been, less than 5% of the area would...

First 121 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Quamera

2,494 Posts.

146

22/04/24

22:26

Post #: 73465492
Share

Originally posted by zipperlip: ↑

You’re correct about it being a cattle property but the they planted the wind factory’s on the “breakaway” country and this part of the property was never cleared, owing to the fact that it wasn’t worth clearing.

It was a refuge for native flora and wildlife, just like a national park.

Expand

And it still would have been, less than 5% of the area would have been affected in the construction phase reducing to about 2% including access roads once everything was completed.
2 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 15 more messages in this thread...

First 121 Last

SPONSORED BY