Do you know what you are talking about or just doing a Magoo?
ETM has been an intended REE miner beyond the first 3 years. Like gbb vouched above. Then GGG took back the rights off the tottering seller who was up to other intentions that we see werent well supported. Otherwise why take legal action?
Why would GGG take the REE rights back to mine REEs, well over 10 years ago, if their intention wasnt to mine them. Its so odd youd even try say that. Are you guys getting desperate?
Query about old agreement, page-45
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 79 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
