Query about old agreement, page-72

you as usual avoided the all the question and make up rest. I though a settlement from the company of $32 million was a clear answer who won. again you mis quote the magistrate who agreed with all parties at the start of the court case against the transfer of the shares but as the company lost big time the end result they were transfer as it was all legal . really instead of trawling through data and finding three words that may fit you imaginary case why don't you look at the final result a massive loss to the company.
But then you continue to out do your self in idiotic statements, with no evidence you still are trying to put uranium in eudialyte despite 10,000 assays, academics ,the government, your own director, even the chinese saying there is none ,why persist with such an obvious lie hint go look at the evidence or talk to your director you hired to look for eudialyte