I think it was drafted when the previous owner and part...

I think it was drafted when the previous owner and part shareholder was wanting to just exploit uranium
That was a daft move as we now know. As GGG then found a better way previously unknown and has now successfully worked out how to extract the REES from steenstrupine.
This meant that the previous intention for interest in mining uranium was dropped and now only marginally extracted.
This greatly upset the other mine as they thought they would be a big fish of REEs and now is a lost minnow barely mentioned on google among the dozens of ETM publications.
ETM also submitted an amendment. Further showing no uranium would be removed at all. Which was denied. This was done under legal advice. The solicitors are happy to continue the case from there. At the utter dismay of others nearby who now appear threatened by the competition again shadowing them again into insignificance.