question for human pollution skeptics, page-6

  1. 29,491 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 33

    kingpins,


    A: Totally agree, politicians suck.
    B: Agree, however humans input can't be ingored.
    C: Agree
    D: agree, politicians suck
    E: Agree, some how money is a magic pollution remover. Maybe if we wave it in the air it will remove the CO2. :7
    F: agree, politicians suck.

    They lie, put words in others peoples mouths. Science would say 'massive increases of CO2 increases the energy available for climate cycles. Man-made CO2 is in a dramatic increase"

    Humans have produced, in the last 20yrs more pollution than the combined total of all the millions of years previous. What will the next 50 be like?

    Basically the energy industry has to change. Even if you take the environmental issues out of the discussion, fossil fuels will run out. Without green energy we will be back to the caves.

    JX,

    "...greenies around here who are mainly intent on destruction,..."

    By definition, if these people actually exist, there not greenies.

    "The green movement of today is a very sinister one and should have no role in a democratic world"

    A bit of a 'straw-man' attack. Who are you talking about?

    Australia has the resources and the brains to be the world leader in 'green' industries.

    Stocks to watch BLG.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.