question time, page-157

I cant seem to understand the sudden drop in SP today. In my opinion the recent 'cleansing statement' was in no way reflective of a negative outcome. Quite the opposite. As previously stated in this discussion, the 'consultants' (an ambiguous job description at best), were clearly happy to be reimbursed for their work by way of shares in the company. That to me suggests they are nothing but confident in the success of the company, even more so if they were consulting in regards to the legal issues surrounding the trial.

Does anybody have any other alternate view in regards to this?