OK, maybe my post today was a little unfair, so this is an opportunity for the bears to prove me wrong.
Most of us are familiar with reports of "house prices going this way or that way."
For investors, however, data that measures price movements is often quite useless. It does not illustrate what is really occurring in specific segments of the market. And more importantly, the data does not take into account factors that may positively impact future prices in a particular city, town or suburb.
So although the commercial media employs time-poor journalists who do not provide us with this information, it is these very specific details that can make a huge difference to investors.
Now, bears, even you must admit that not all property has equal potential. So why don't you display your knowledge, now, as it relates to forecasting which areas and/or types of properties will outperform the wider market?
Its fine to say "all areas will fall in value," but how about being just a little more specific for once?
